British MPs have flagged the government's growing reliance on data analytics firm Palantir Technologies as a critical security vulnerability, calling for the termination of a £330M NHS deal and greater transparency around military contracts.
A parliamentary committee released a report warning that the UK's dependence on Palantir has become "an unacceptable point of weakness" for national security and public services.
The lawmakers specifically targeted a major contract between Palantir and the National Health Service valued at £330 million, recommending the government end the arrangement. They also demanded full disclosure of terms governing a separate military contract with the company.
Palantir, a US-based firm specializing in data integration and analysis, has expanded significantly across UK government agencies in recent years. The company's access to sensitive health records and defense information has raised concerns about concentrated dependence on a single vendor, particularly one headquartered outside the country.
The committee's concerns center on several issues: the lack of transparency surrounding contract terms, the extent of the company's access to classified information, and the potential risks of relying heavily on a single private contractor for critical infrastructure and defense applications.
The report also implicitly raises questions about data sovereignty. With healthcare and military data flowing through Palantir's systems, MPs worry about exposure to foreign intelligence operations or regulatory overreach, particularly given current geopolitical tensions.
Palantir has defended its government work, emphasizing its security protocols and commitment to protecting sensitive information. The company has served multiple government agencies globally, including in the United States and allied nations.
The UK government has not yet responded formally to the committee's recommendations. A decision to terminate the NHS contract would represent a significant shift in policy and potentially force the health service to rebuild data management capabilities independently.
The report reflects broader debates in allied democracies about balancing the efficiency gains offered by private tech firms against security risks and data sovereignty concerns. Similar scrutiny of foreign tech contractors has emerged in other countries grappling with how to modernize government infrastructure without compromising sensitive information.
President Trump signed a revised artificial intelligence executive order following weeks of internal disagreements and policy changes. The final version represents a significant pullback from earlier proposals.
Samsung averted a major strike by awarding substantial bonuses to chip division workers, but the move has triggered resentment across other company divisions and raised broader questions about distributing AI-driven profits.
Alphabet announced an $80 billion capital raise to fuel artificial intelligence development, signaling aggressive positioning ahead of potential IPOs from competitors like OpenAI and Anthropic.
Google's parent company Alphabet is raising $80 billion through equity offerings, including a significant investment from Berkshire Hathaway, to fund its accelerating artificial intelligence infrastructure spending.