SCHNEIER: THINK PROCESS, NOT OUTPUT, WHEN USING AI

Speaking from his experience teaching at Harvard Kennedy School and the University of Toronto, Schneier observes students using AI to complete writing assignments—a practice he views as wasteful of tuition money. Yet he acknowledges a fundamental tension: if AI writing assistants will define their professional future, why shouldn't students adopt them now? The answer depends on your goals. When the process itself builds skills or knowledge—like a workout that matters beyond the physical result—avoiding AI shortcuts makes sense. When only the output matters, delegating to AI is rational. Schneier's framework applies broadly across tasks. A student learning to write benefits from struggling through drafts. A professional meeting a deadline doesn't. The question isn't whether AI is good or bad, but whether you're optimizing for capability-building or completion.