Security expert Bruce Schneier argues that two and a half decades of mass surveillance programs have failed to deliver promised security benefits and should be dismantled. The call comes as surveillance capabilities continue expanding globally.
Schneier, a prominent cryptographer and security researcher, contends that mass surveillance initiated in the 1990s has become normalized without meaningful evaluation of its effectiveness or societal impact.
Key points from the analysis:
- Ineffectiveness: Mass surveillance has not prevented major security threats at rates justifying its scope and cost
- Privacy erosion: Dragnet programs collect data on billions of innocent people
- Mission creep: Systems built for counterterrorism now target routine criminal investigations and civil matters
- Technical alternatives: Targeted surveillance and traditional investigative methods prove more efficient
Schneier calls for policy shifts toward warrant-based surveillance, data minimization, and transparency requirements. The article sparked discussion on Hacker News, with 139 points and 17 comments debating surveillance effectiveness, government accountability, and privacy rights.
The argument reflects growing skepticism among security professionals about whether mass surveillance programs justify their constitutional and ethical costs.
Cybersecurity professionals are pushing back against apocalyptic hacking predictions from AI industry leaders, calling the warnings technically incoherent and based on fundamental misunderstandings of cybersecurity.
A security researcher demonstrated a critical vulnerability in Baseten's infrastructure, obtaining full administrative access to the company's production GitHub account in under half an hour. The exploit highlights widespread risks in how companies manage authentication tokens.
Acronis has disclosed a high-severity Linux privilege escalation vulnerability in its backup plugin for cPanel, WebHost Manager (WHM), and Plesk that attackers are actively exploiting in the wild.