Midjourney is requesting that Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. disclose their internal AI practices as part of a legal defense against copyright infringement claims filed by the studios in 2025.
The AI image generation company has filed court motions seeking discovery of how the major studios deploy artificial intelligence across their operations. The request comes as the three entertainment giants pursue litigation alleging that Midjourney enabled large-scale infringement of their copyrighted characters and intellectual property.
Midjourney's legal strategy appears aimed at establishing that the studios themselves use AI in ways that could inform the court's understanding of industry-wide practices. By compelling disclosure of the studios' AI implementations, the company may be attempting to demonstrate that AI usage in entertainment is more widespread and complex than the copyright claims suggest.
The dispute centers on Midjourney's image generation capabilities, which the studios contend were trained on or facilitate the creation of content infringing their protected characters. Midjourney has previously argued that its technology operates within fair use protections and that it implements safeguards against infringing content generation.
The litigation represents one of several high-profile legal battles between AI companies and content creators over copyright and training data. Similar cases involving other AI firms have raised questions about the boundaries between fair use and infringement in machine learning contexts.
Discovery requests like Midjourney's are standard legal procedure, allowing parties to compel the production of documents and information relevant to disputes. However, the request to reveal comprehensive AI practices could expose significant operational details about how Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. integrate AI into their creative and business processes.
The case underscores ongoing tensions between AI innovation and intellectual property protection in entertainment. As both AI companies and content creators expand their use of artificial intelligence, courts will likely face increased demands to clarify what constitutes permissible versus infringing AI deployment.
Startups like Altur are deploying AI chatbots to handle debt collection calls, automating a process traditionally done by humans. Y Combinator has backed six debt collection and settlement startups over the past six years.
Following recent earthquakes, Venezuelan developers and citizens deployed AI-powered websites and apps to locate missing persons and coordinate disaster relief as government response lagged.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has created a dedicated AI office and committed to protecting Australian creators from copyright infringement by artificial intelligence companies. The government rejected plans to grant tech firms free access to Australian data.