Major studios have declined to comment on existential AI warnings, while entertainment labor groups push back on doomsday narratives and demand focus on immediate workplace impacts.
The tech industry has escalated concerns about AI's potential to pose existential threats to humanity. Meanwhile, Hollywood studios—many actively deploying generative AI—are staying quiet on the matter.
The Verge contacted Disney, Netflix, Amazon, Lionsgate, and other studios using AI, along with generative AI startups. None responded to requests for comment on recent warnings about the technology's risks.
Entertainment labor organizations, including the Screen Actors Guild, are shifting the conversation toward present-day threats. Rather than debating hypothetical long-term dangers, they're highlighting concrete harms already affecting workers—job displacement, contract negotiations, and compensation disputes.
The divide reflects broader tensions: while some tech leaders warn of future catastrophic scenarios, creative workers face immediate disruption from AI adoption in film and television production. Labor advocates argue that near-term workplace consequences deserve the same urgent attention given to speculative existential scenarios.
Europe's central bank chief Christine Lagarde this week outlined a critical dilemma: the continent can reject AI and forfeit economic growth, or adopt it and risk dependence on US and Chinese technology.
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed Executive Order 22 to curb data center expansion in the state, banning non-disclosure agreements for such projects and requiring expedited noise regulations.
An AI-assisted intelligence report falsely claimed a Chinese ship in the Middle East carried nuclear weapons components, nearly triggering a military conflict during tensions with Iran.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has proposed a framework to slow AI development through independent safety evaluators and lab coordination, drawing support and criticism from industry peers.