European Union officials are exploring restrictions on using American cloud platforms to store and process sensitive government data. The move reflects growing concerns over data sovereignty and access by US intelligence agencies.
The EU is weighing regulatory measures that would limit or prohibit government agencies from relying on cloud services provided by US companies for classified or sensitive information. Officials cite potential exposure to surveillance through US laws like the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which grants broad data access powers to American intelligence agencies.
This development reflects ongoing tensions between Europe and the US over data protection and sovereignty. Previous controversies, including revelations about NSA surveillance programs, have prompted the EU to pursue greater digital independence.
The proposed restrictions could accelerate European development of homegrown cloud infrastructure and alternatives. Major US cloud providers including Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud currently serve numerous EU government clients.
No formal legislation has been introduced yet. The consideration remains part of broader EU efforts to strengthen data protection standards and reduce reliance on American technology platforms for critical operations.
Singapore-based Datagrid has secured approval to build a NZ$3.5bn AI datacentre in Makarewa, southern New Zealand, but residents are demanding greater transparency over environmental concerns.
Major European software companies including SAP, Capgemini, Nemetschek, Hexagon, and Dassault reported better-than-expected earnings this season, defying concerns about AI disruption and geopolitical uncertainty.
Microsoft's carbon emissions jumped 25 percent last year to 34 million metric tons, according to the company's 2026 sustainability report. The increase threatens the tech giant's climate commitments.
Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters apologized for describing employees facing AI-driven layoffs as "lower-value human capital." The comments sparked regulatory scrutiny and union backlash as the bank prepares to cut approximately 7,800 jobs.